Was ist Eure Motivation Altglas zu adaptieren?

[Bessamatic]

Siehe https://www.digicamclub.de/showthread.php?t=27022
Paul hat sich vermutlich diesen Adapter bestellt.

[hofsethpaul]

Further to the comment above ad internal lens elements: the Contaflex designed for Kodaks badly designed film carrier does not have the unremovable basic lens where add-ons like the pro-xx had to be used with the built in lens to function. The 126 version did have some parts fixed to the camera body, such as the aperture control and the focussing helix. However the aperture itself is in the usual place and can be operated by any correctly placed pin. Thus the Chinese adapter "only" needs the correct size and distance bayonets , a helicoid , plus a correctly placed pin. No optical components. I hope that it turns out to have Novoflex precision more hppenstance engineering is not fair to the precision of the optics. Just like the original instamatic cassettes were a mismatch.

p

[Rob70]

Further to the comment above ad internal lens elements: the Contaflex designed for Kodaks badly designed film carrier does not have the unremovable basic lens where add-ons like the pro-xx had to be used with the built in lens to function. The 126 version did have some parts fixed to the camera body, such as the aperture control and the focussing helix. However the aperture itself is in the usual place and can be operated by any correctly placed pin. Thus the Chinese adapter "only" needs the correct size and distance bayonets , a helicoid , plus a correctly placed pin. No optical components. I hope that it turns out to have Novoflex precision more hppenstance engineering is not fair to the precision of the optics. Just like the original instamatic cassettes were a mismatch.

p

Very interesting, thanks for the Info.