Zitat Zitat von hinnerker Beitrag anzeigen
Yeah.. i got it for a cheap price..

Muss mal schnell meine Freude mitteilen. Grad bei einem Angebot den Zuschlag erhalten.

Besitze zwar das Elmarit 2.8/90mm als Leicaflex 2-Cam Version, aber wollte schon immer mal wissen, wie das Cron 90mm im Vergleich ist.

Jemand der was drüber sagen kann?

LG
Henry
Glückwunsch Henry, es soll etwas schlechter sein als das Olympus 2/90

90mm f/2.0 Zuiko Macro (multi-coated):
OM-2000 with mirror and aperture prefire
Vignetting = C+ @ f/2, B at f/2.8, B @ f/4, A- thereafter
Distortion = none
Aperture Center Corner
f/2 B+ A-
f/2.8 A- B+
f/4 B+ B
f/5.6 A- B+
f/8 A- A-
f/11 A- B+
f/16 A- B-
f/22 A- B-
Notes: Moderately high contrast images at f/22; high contrast images at
f/2, f/2.8 and f/16; very high contrast images at f/4, f/5.6 and f/11;
extremely high contrast images at f/8. Paired SQF grade and contrast
comparisons to the Leitz 90mm f/2 Summicron-R test done on a Leicaflex,
with SQF differences significant at the 1/3 grade level.
Condition: 9+ (KEH=Ex+).
------------------------------------

Leitz 90mm f/2 Summicron-R (1978 era 3-cam)
Leicaflex with mirror and diaphragm prefire
Vignetting = B @ f/2, A- @ f/2.8, A thereafter
Distortion = slight pincushion
Aperture Center Corner
f/2* C+ C
f/2 B B
f/2.8 B+ B
f/4 B+ A-
f/5.6 A A
f/8 A- A-
f/11 A A
f/16 A B
Notes: * = Tested with a B+W 010 filter. Moderately high contrast images
at f/2; high contrast images at f/2.8 and f/16; very high contrast at
f/4 and f/11; extremely high contrast images at f/5.6 and f/8. Lens
condition 9+ (KEH=Ex+). Paired SQF grade and contrast comparison to the
90mm f/2 Zuiko Macro test done on a OM-2000, with SQF differences
significant at the 1/3 grade level.